Food and drink chiefs slam government's packaging waste plans

Paul Freeston, president of the Food and Drink Federation said it is ‘patently unfair’ that all businesses will be charged in the same way, however they currently deal with waste.

He argues that companies which are already sustainable will be paying twice under the new system and could pass on costs to consumers.

The updated rules from the government will regulate ‘extended producer responsibility’ to tackle the growing problem of packaging waste.

These regulations aim to shift the waste and recycling costs of packaging from local authorities to the businesses that produce it.

In turn, these costs will often be passed onto consumers in the form of higher pricing of many food items.

Paul Freeston, who is also CEO and chair of apetito UK and North America, said: “We fully support the principles of EPR – responsible use of plastic is the right way to do business.

“However, government has announced that it will simply not consider closed-loop systems for at least a year after EPR commences – failing to account for the fact that the most responsible businesses have invested significantly in future-looking systems that improve rates of re-use and recycling.

“And even when they do come to consider closed-loop, they have suggested that they will only make allowances for materials that are not ‘commonly collected’ – even if the closed-loop system (such as our own) generates far better results.

“It is patently unfair that these businesses are to be taxed as if they simply had done nothing and the industry is shocked to see there is no allowance for those who are taking plastic out of the system.

“Everyone will be subject to these new taxes, which means good sustainable businesses will be paying twice.”